Food is the planet’s biggest environmental problem: what can we do about it?
The growing world population needs food, but the environmental impacts of food production, inefficient agricultural land use, and the contradiction of rising levels of both hunger and food waste, call for a fresh approach to getting nutrition to the world sustainably.
Speaking on World Food Day (16 October 2021), University of Stellenbosch Business School senior lecturer in strategy and sustainability, Dr Jako Volschenk, said that a growing population was “only a part of the problem” and that the types of food produced and consumed, and the agri-food chain itself, need a re-think.
Increasing vegetarian or flexitarian diets, reducing and re-purposing food waste, and innovative use of insects as an alternative protein source and in converting food waste, are among the ways to reduce the impact of food production on climate change and biodiversity, he said.
The world population has doubled in the past 50 years to the current 7.9 billion, and it is estimated that global food production will need to increase by 70% to feed a projected world population of 9.7 billion by 2050.
In South Africa in 2021, 10 million adults and 2.8 million children experienced hunger in the past week, while the country wastes 10.3 million tons of food per year – highlighting the disconnect between food security and food supply in South Africa, Dr Volschenk said.
“In addition to population growth by births, at approximately 200 000 per day, people are also living longer. World Bank data indicates that life expectancy in South Africa has increased from 53 to 64 years over the last 50 years, which implies a further 20% increase in the South African population and people needing food,” he said.
Dr Volschenk said that contrary to what many people thought, global consumption of meat had tripled since 1970, and that by 2011 the total number of chickens, cows, pigs and sheep in world agriculture outnumbered the human population by three to one.
“Human wealth has increased during the period from 1970 and with higher income, more people can afford to eat meat – but the growth in meat consumption is a major challenge to the longevity of humanity due to both its impacts on human health and on the environment.
“Food production – and especially meat – is a major driver of numerous environmental problems. Livestock farming produces more carbon emissions than growing vegetables, fruits and grains, with livestock responsible for 15% of greenhouse gas emissions responsible for global warming. Rearing animals also contributes to deforestation and loss of biodiversity, as rainforests, forests and pristine land are turned into pasturing and fields for growing animal feed. Water for irrigating these fields depletes already scarce water resources,” he said.
Animal farming to meet increasing demand for meat requires more land. The world currently uses about 50% of all habitable land for agriculture, and due to rising concerns about climate change and biodiversity loss, cannot afford to use more.
Dr Volschenk said feed was the major cost in meat production, and beef and lamb were “the worst” at converting feed into meat, requiring 25kg and 15kg respectively of feed to produce 1kg of meat, while pork requires 6.4kg.
“Meanwhile, producing 1kg of eggs requires only 2.3kg of feed, and consuming eggs avoids the increasingly difficult ethical dilemma of killing animals for human food. In 50 years from now, eating meat will likely be frowned upon, although right now environmental concerns are the bigger driver,” Dr Volschenk said.
How do we solve this?
On addressing the environmental impacts of food production, Dr Volschenk argues that humanity should firstly switch to vegetarian diets, or flexitarian diets that are mostly plant-based but allow meat, fish and other animal products in moderation.
“There is reason to cut out all animal products, but this leads to sub-optimal use of land, since not all agricultural land is suitable for crop-growing. In dry parts of the world like the Karoo, for example, cultivated croplands can’t be sustained in the absence of water but can still sustain grazing animals.
“However, in evaluating different types of diets, there is an optimal level of meat consumption in terms of the carrying capacity of land, and humanity is far beyond that.”
Secondly, he said, food waste must be reduced.
“South Africa’s 10.3 million tons of food waste is equivalent to more than a third of local food production. Wasted food is unacceptable given the levels of hunger in our country. And it also represents a loss of the water and energy resources used in its production, as well as food sent to landfill generating methane gases that contribute to global warming.”
More than half of food waste takes place in the middle of the supply chain, “between farm and fork” – 19% in post-harvest handling and storage and 49% in manufacturing/processing and packaging – while 18% is wasted by households and consumers.
“Methods like drying, canning, freezing foods to prolong shelf-life, and innovations in farm-to-fork production and consumption need to advance further. Initiatives by retailers to reduce food waste – better demand forecasting and supply chain management, improving cold chains, increasing donations of surplus edible but beyond-dated food, and managing organic waste to reduce contribution to landfill – are all commendable, but we need more.
“We need to do better at wasting less and getting food to people who need it,” Dr Volschenk said.
Thirdly, an innovation that could assist in “closing the loop between food waste and protein”, is the use of insects such as the black soldier fly, he said.
Such insects feed on food waste, reducing the production of methane from decomposing food, and their larvae become a source of chicken and pig feed in agriculture, as well as being used in pet food.
“This could one day be used for human food too. Insects are a far more environmentally-friendly source of protein, and convert waste into protein in the most efficient manner.”
Dr Volschenk said population growth is the biggest driver of the need for food, in turn driving global warming and other environmental problems.
“Ultimately, humanity will have to consider voluntary population control measures, but this is unlikely to happen and the world’s population is unlikely to reduce substantially in the near future. This means that we need to shift our diets away from meat, and especially from meat that is inefficient in its feed conversion and land use.
“We need to be much more mindful of what we eat, where it comes from, how it is produced, and be much more conscious of avoiding food waste,” he said.